Re: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with M&O bits
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with M&O bits



On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:09:42AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Two goals, two solutions: that is OK systems engineering IMHO.

Unfortunately (?), the IETF is engaged in protocol engineering, not
systems engineering.  Throwing spaghetti at the wall just to see what
sticks is not adequate protocol engineering.  It is abysmal.

-- 
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil?	 https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		     you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins

Attachment: pgpVgGnbZcMF8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.