Re: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with M&O bits
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with M&O bits



On 2008-10-17 05:18, David W. Hankins wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 03:10:06PM +0800, Kadirvel Chockalingam Vanniarajan wrote:
>> 1) Is there a way for a IPv6 client to distinguish between a authoritative RA vs non-authoritative RA? I guess not but I may be wrong. I refer to an unauthorized host sending out RA to be non-authoritative RA.
> 
> There isn't.  In DHCPv4 operations, most operators implement link
> layer filters, where the potential for nefarious peers on the switch
> fabric is possible.  Server-replies come only from servers with these
> filters.
> 
> A similar method is required with RA, and currently with DHCP (but
> some of us think we know how we can put an end to that).  There is a
> subtle difference; DHCP filters are just UDP port limitations.  RA
> filters have to peer into ND packet fields.

Have you reviewed draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra-01? Does it state
the issues correctly? (Please reply to v6ops, not here.)

    Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.