RE: Standard status of RFC 3879
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Standard status of RFC 3879
FWIW, I wouldn't mind advancing it if there is significant new
evidence or experience to document at the same time. If not (perhaps
you were referring to this), just updating on the standards track and
keeping the document unchanged, doesn't seem to have that much point
given we need to put energy to other work as well.
Site-locals and ULAs is one area where I suspect our understanding of
the situation has improved, and will continue to improve. Timing the
update properly to gather that understanding is probably a good idea.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.