Re: Standard status of RFC 3879

[Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz at sri.com>]

In the latest version of the US DoD IPv6 profiles, RFC 3879 is mentioned 
only as a footnote because RFC 4291 appears to be definitive enough.

Bob Hinden wrote:
> Christian,
>
> > RFC 3879 was published as proposed standard about 5 years ago. Do we 
> > intend to leave it at that stage, or to update its status along the 
> > standard track?
>
> What did you have in mind?  Is there a reason to advance it?
>
> Bob
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6 at ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Ed Jankiewicz - SRI International
Fort Monmouth Branch Office - IPv6 Research 
Supporting DISA Standards Engineering Branch
732-389-1003 or  ed.jankiewicz at sri.com 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------