RFC4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Auto configuration in IPv6"

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: RFC4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Auto configuration in IPv6"
From: Prakasha Shetty <gprakash.gps at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:58:10 +0530
Delivered-to: ipv6 at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:content-type; bh=rY4D7Lm8mIum9HuFJIdkrdvHapWfC6835d2eFok7zjA=; b=HF+DTwwdYrjHqWkzseajZsJI67hH4+9X/5NobMo2FSXMNsv1E3La/ujzCJznDIwZqE Ogp0ZMOOMI03xdyAxdnKnREqjObpKG6PaN8l2M7zh+cOZaFqGv57OhoDaalzX9NoqZrQ 6hC5G8FIyTtCMvMhbhLBzvvllML0JsSh6clyQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:content-type; b=oeiD55WjDqhy8hMfCMFp+0aW/HhCfd+pWiw49DD1hpFvo/330O0WSB4tj4zs4gEFY3 EYxHei9VfBYNNBVyqgWckHFV2OUmUnGKFblPWZgUCoMqBSgoGP9VIINFlnduObDHjWh8 pCMGgdDRt9sPfg+yKHkdrnjvePcp+FATXIbiE=
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

Could you please provide me the information related to RFC 4941 testing; how to test this feature and please provide me if you have any automated/manual test cases to test this feature on Linux machines or AIX machines.

Thanks &
Regards
Prakash

Prev by Date: Re: draft-rabil-dhc-dhcpv6-xmlconfig-00.txt`
Next by Date: Re: draft-rabil-dhc-dhcpv6-xmlconfig-00.txt`
Previous by thread: Re: draft-rabil-dhc-dhcpv6-xmlconfig-00.txt`
Next by thread: Hop Limit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

RFC4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Auto configuration in IPv6"

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.