Re: 6MAN WG Last Call:draft-ietf-6man-overlap-fragment-01.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 6MAN WG Last Call:draft-ietf-6man-overlap-fragment-01.txt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Thomas Narten wrote:
> How about something like:
>
> When reassembling an IPv6 datagram, if one or more its constituent
> fragments is determined to be an overlapping fragment, the entire
> datagram (and any constituent fragments -- including those not yet
> received), MUST be silently discarded.
I think this phrase is really good, but does it need to be silent?
I also support advancing this document as well.
Regards,
Seiichi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFKHySgcrhTYfxyMkIRAg2GAJ4xJGEgL1sbnlLeak+HylD/7SNNpwCfUnuO
IL4Uu/lm61a2LMe6FzPmNWI=
=N9tj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.