Experimental status of RFC 4389? ND Proxy

To: <ipv6 at ietf.org>
Subject: Experimental status of RFC 4389? ND Proxy
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant at cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:19:54 -0400
Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=shemant at cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: dthaler at microsoft.com
Delivered-to: ipv6 at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2523; t=1246281596; x=1247145596; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=shemant at cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Hemant=20Singh=20(shemant)=22=20<shemant at cisco. com> |Subject:=20Experimental=20status=20of=20RFC=204389?=20ND=2 0Proxy |Sender:=20 |To:=20<ipv6 at ietf.org>; bh=Iu8mpCRE6okxX4RBhxCj2/SnAT2dt5ThVWIK/XQRJgs=; b=Q149Re24HRojXmqTCE/hmKrxsKcO2VguBNgxAgjDRY/JKh2+AYKwcjmmHH l2cb5jBifReqWKMmP7n/jEkHV2i3Mu0wr2ZZeWWgsWuAYK3YeGXaBTfL/Ex5 lOegxMM7u2;
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: Acn4vErPiuWPde4iSmm0Z+dCIWT4DA==
Thread-topic: Experimental status of RFC 4389? ND Proxy

6man folks,

Does anyone know why RFC 4389 was deemed as Experimental for status as opposed to say, Standards Track?

Thanks,

Hemant

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Experimental status of RFC 4389? ND Proxy
  - From: Dave Thaler