 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 9 jul 2009, at 21:55, Christian Huitema wrote:
There are about 3.7 billion usable IPv4 addresses. Do you really want to make a table that big, when the IPv6 host is going to expose everything to every IPv6 node it talks to anyway?
Very few hosts speak to 3.7 billion peers at the same time. Those who do probably have dual stack. In most cases, the working set is much smaller. After all, the existing Nat44 keep state, and they do not explode.
Yes, but a NAT44 doesn't have to sync translation mappings with a NAT44.I don't think IETF standardization for something like this is useful, certainly not at this time.