Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-00.txt

[Thomas Narten <narten at us.ibm.com>]

Tony,

Could you provide some background on:

1) why reissue this document at this time

2) what has changed in the document relative to previous versions?

Finally, IMO, based on previous discussions, this document is/was
effectively dead. There has always been a lot of controversy with
C-ULAs, and there simply hasn't been consensus to move the document
forward. What has changed since the last time the WG had a discussion
about ULAs? Is there some new information we should be considering?

I do not think it is particularly useful (or pleasant) to have a
replay of old positions on this topic, if in fact, no minds will
change. So unless there is a compelling reason to revisit C-ULAs at
this time, I'm not at all sure we need to have this discussion yet
again.

Thomas