Node Requirements: Issue 15 - IPv6 RA Flags Option (RFC 5075)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Node Requirements: Issue 15 - IPv6 RA Flags Option (RFC 5075)
Tim Chown <tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk> writes:
> There's a couple of newish RA-related RFCs out that may be relevant,
> though one is experimental: RFC 5006 (perhaps relevant in 6.2.2 of
> the node requirements draft) and RFC 5075.
We should mention RFC 5075/5175.
I came up with some text while thinking about this document a while
back, but I can't find it right off. Oh. I alredy snuck it into the
document! :-)
Does the following make sense:
5.3. IPv6 Router Advertisement Flags Option - RFC 5175
Router Advertisements include an 8-bit field of single-bit Router
Advertisement flags. The Router Advertisement Flags Option extends
the number of available flag bits by 48 bits. At the time of this
writing, 6 of the original 8 bit flags have been assigned, while 2
are available for future assignment. No flags have been defined that
make use of the new option, and thus strictly speaking, there is no
requirement to implement the option today. However, implementations
that are able to pass unrecognized options to a higher level entity
that may be able to understand them (e.g., a user-level process using
a "raw socket" facility), MAY take steps to handle the option in
anticipation of a future usage.
I really don't think we should require folks implement this option,
given it is not yet in use, and it may be years before any such bits
are assigned.
Thomas
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.