Re: Node Requirements: Issue 13 - CGA/SeND support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Node Requirements: Issue 13 - CGA/SeND support



On 24/07/09 11:54 PM, "Eric Levy-Abegnoli" <elevyabe at cisco.com> wrote:

> Hesham Soliman a écrit :
>>   
>>> SeND is theoretically not easy to deploy - you need to provision
>>> 
>>> cryptography material on all nodes.
>>>     
>> 
>> => Why? You only need to provision routers if you want them to support proof
>> of prefix ownership, but you certainly don't need to provision all nodes,
>> that's the advantage of CGAs.
>> 
>>   
> That's true for CGA, but not for router authorization. Any node that
> want to verify router authorization need to be provisionned with the
> anchor certificate.

=> Yes of course. 

Hesham


> Eric
>> Hesham
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> That implementations are not even
>>   
>>> properly integrated into operating systems makes it worse. I somewhat
>>> 
>>> expect that somewhat secure networks will use network-side filtering as is
>>> 
>>> done for ARP instead, as it requires no host-side changes.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I don't think it deserves a "SHOULD" at this point.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>     
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6 at ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>>   
> 



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.