RE: Node Requirements: Issue 14 - Privacy Extensions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Node Requirements: Issue 14 - Privacy Extensions
It would be a helpful reminder for AS if we keep the second sentence:
It is
> noted that a number of applications do not work with addresses
> generated with this method, while other applications work quite
> well with them.
Hongyu
=================================
> Note also that I propose dropping:
>
> It is recommended that this behavior be configurable on a
> connection basis within each application when available. It is
> noted that a number of applications do not work with addresses
> generated with this method, while other applications work quite
> well with them.
>
> The above recommendation is not in RFC 4941, and I do not
> believe it is appropriate for an AS to be adding a
> requirement that 4941 itself does not mention.
>
> Comments?
>
> Thomas
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6 at ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.