RE: Node Requirements: Issue 14 - Privacy Extensions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Node Requirements: Issue 14 - Privacy Extensions



It would be a helpful reminder for AS if we keep the second sentence:

 It is
>    noted that a number of applications do not work with addresses
>    generated with this method, while other applications work quite
>    well with them.

Hongyu

=================================
> Note also that I propose dropping:
> 
>    It is recommended that this behavior be configurable on a
>    connection basis within each application when available.  It is
>    noted that a number of applications do not work with addresses
>    generated with this method, while other applications work quite
>    well with them.
> 
> The above recommendation is not in RFC 4941, and I do not 
> believe it is appropriate for an AS to be adding a 
> requirement that 4941 itself does not mention.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Thomas
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6 at ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.