Re: UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators

To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:40:28 +1200
Cc: Behave WG <behave at ietf.org>, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr>, 6man 6man <ipv6 at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: ipv6 at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TYrWGx9l1KR3+JS+Y5T2Q60QGzigAwJBxKIowpDtcYI=; b=UxHsdS6Rr5QlBXYyerIhfgTL3wV1QSb++IyhwOnNiWxhKGvbVzEHp2qxoJKUIMmb0f Un/wKhItt6NnTNwr4aKrEylzKPV7gaS8gHBCUWiJy1yOCS39Mz1QtzvTOBDFFhhj8K/o D0XQcGq+k3EN+GG0KWnn69Hghxr0+BtNCdAkA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=YU0yoic3Qf0hI5NppgIAA8vFEB6H36hjYQIbKeLYUxlg5p+BQXlyDXAJ4XfaiAS9XF ZLP2hjeb5+zqkrEQSfU26YsgZpuHcFSJK16B0U1JC8SobrNkdfMQ/+B7bslB2KXlLPBN YEb1vREpsWHT1Rr/gSHG5jlMvgDIOwin96ANA=
In-reply-to: <75cb24520907280203h4d5acc64xa0aa3603918f6b3b at mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <75cb24520907280114w1c543206u329ea842d6f46f8c at mail.gmail.com> <200907280853.n6S8rsfI049268 at givry.fdupont.fr> <75cb24520907280203h4d5acc64xa0aa3603918f6b3b at mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

Hi Chris,

On 2009-07-28 21:03, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> 
> ok. my sole point really was 'discard' is not acceptable. if you toss
> away a packet you ought to tell someone you did that.

Er, do your routers do that when they throw away packets due to
congestion?

   Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators
  - From: Benny Amorsen

References:
- Re: UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators
  - From: Christopher Morrow
- Re: UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators
  - From: Francis Dupont
- Re: UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators
  - From: Christopher Morrow

Prev by Date: Re: Node Requirements: Issue 14 - Privacy Extensions
Next by Date: Re: Node Requirements: Issue 14 - Privacy Extensions
Previous by thread: Re: UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators
Next by thread: Re: UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.