RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation

["Azinger, Marla" <marla.azinger at frontiercorp.com>]

Great.  Thank you Fred.

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred at cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 3:05 AM
To: Azinger, Marla
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List; draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router at tools.ietf.org; draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs at tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation


On Jul 29, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Azinger, Marla wrote:

> Routing in such an environment calls for a routing protocol. Each CPE
> must run either RIPv6 [RFC2080], IS-IS [RFC5308], or OSPF [RFC5340] on
> a default route and to the homes interal upstream a static default
> route. The issues raised in [RFC3704] also apply, meaning that the two
> CPE routers may each need to observe the source addresses in datagrams
> they handle to divert them to the other CPE to handle upstream

I'll figure something out there. This makes it sound like only the CPE routers have to run a routing protocol; in fact, all of the routers in the home have to run a routing protocol. But yes, something like that.