Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation



Yiu,

IMHO, it is high bar for the operators to support dynamic routing protocol for residential customers. Today, each access router can easily support thousands of customers. Imagine the access router needs to receive thousands if not millions updates every few minutes, I am not sure the route process is built to support this kind of load. Besides, if the CPE is compromised and inject some routes didn't belong to it, it will create security issue.

no, no... this is not the model I'm talking about. there will be no dynamic routing protocol in the access network.
this is purely in the home network, from the CPE and downstream.

cheers,
Ole

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.