RE: Consensus call on adopting draft-kawamura-ipv6-text-representation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Consensus call on adopting draft-kawamura-ipv6-text-representation
Hi Chairs,
Reiterating my comments at the mike at the 6man session, I think this document is very useful and should be adopted as wg item.
Cheers
Suresh
-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Erik Kline
Sent: July-30-09 4:22 AM
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: Brian Haberman; ipv6 WG Mailing List
Subject: Re: Consensus call on adopting draft-kawamura-ipv6-text-representation
+1
2009/7/30 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>:
> I'm in favour
>
> Brian C
>
> On 2009-07-30 01:42, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> All,
>> This is a consensus call on adopting:
>>
>> Title : A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation
>> Author(s) : S. Kawamura, M. Kawashima
>> Filename : draft-kawamura-ipv6-text-representation-03.txt
>> Pages : 14
>> Date : 2009-06-11
>>
>> as a 6MAN Working Group document. Please state your opinion in favor
>> of or against adopting this document by August 15, 2009.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Brian
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6 at ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6 at ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.