Re: [BEHAVE] UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BEHAVE] UDP zero checksums and v4 to v6 translators



Hi,

On 2009-8-4, at 16:27, Rémi Després wrote:
You seem to have missed that the proposal includes a relaxation of
the constraint that zero-checksum UDP datagrams MAY be accepted by
hosts ion the future, just to avoid unnecessary black holes in case
of v4 to v6 translations.

isn't it a non-starter for a translation based *transition* mechanism to depend on host changes?

Lars

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.