Re: Multiple Prefixes in RA
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple Prefixes in RA
Or temporary use of multiple prefixes for renumbering (rfc4192).
Some rogue RA deprecation tools might also use this (eg. rafixd/ramond).
I am not aware of ULAs being used commonly (read: not aware of use
in any campus environment as yet).
tim
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 09:37:16AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:35 AM, TJ <trejrco at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Off the top of my head: A link that has multiple prefixes assigned to it;
> > perhaps a Global and a ULA or simply multiple Globals ...
>
> right, like the original 'how to multihome in ipv6', one router
> interface, 1 prefix from each upstream provider, auto-conf enabled ==
> many prefixes in RA (or perhaps many RA's each with their own
> prefix/default-route info, which may get confusing 'am I on X or Y or
> Z?')
>
> -chris
>
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Vijayrajan ranganathan <vijayrn at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Perhaps a naive question, but can somebody mention some practical use
> >> cases for advertising multiple prefixes in a Router Advertisement?
> >>
> >> Thanks & Regards
> >> Vijay
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> >> ipv6 at ietf.org
> >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > /TJ
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6 at ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6 at ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Tim
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.