Request To Advance: <draft-ietf-6man-overlap-fragment-03.txt>

To: iesg-secretary at ietf.org, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>, Ralph Droms <rdroms at cisco.com>
Subject: Request To Advance: <draft-ietf-6man-overlap-fragment-03.txt>
From: Brian Haberman <brian at innovationslab.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:57:20 -0400
Cc: ipv6 at ietf.org, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden at gmail.com>
Delivered-to: ipv6 at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)

Jari & Ralph,
     On behalf of the 6MAN WG, the chairs request the advancement of:

   Title     : Handling of overlapping IPv6 fragments
   Author(s) : S. Krishnan
   Filename  : draft-ietf-6man-overlap-fragment-03.txt
   Pages     : 7
   Date      : 2009-07-03

as a Proposed Standard.  A 6MAN WG Last Call completed on March 16, 2009
and this version addresses all issues raised.

Regards,
Brian & Bob
6MAN co-chairs

Prev by Date: Request for Agenda Items
Next by Date: Re: What flexibility do 6to4 NAT have with address formats?
Previous by thread: Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility (Wrapped ESP for Traffic Visibility) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: overlapping fragments AD review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Request To Advance: <draft-ietf-6man-overlap-fragment-03.txt>

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.