RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
- To: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant at cisco.com>, "Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <wbeebee at cisco.com>, Antonio Querubin <tony at lava.net>
- Subject: RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
- From: "Dunn, Jeffrey H." <jdunn at mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:29:25 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: Thomas Narten <narten at us.ibm.com>, "6man-ads at tools.ietf.org" <6man-ads at tools.ietf.org>, SAVI Mailing List <savi at ietf.org>, "william.allen.simpson at gmail.com" <william.allen.simpson at gmail.com>, Hesham Soliman <hesham at elevatemobile.com>, Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark at sun.com>, "Susan at core3.amsl.com" <Susan at core3.amsl.com>, "savi-ads at tools.ietf.org" <savi-ads at tools.ietf.org>, Robin Mersh <rmersh at broadband-forum.org>, "Susan Thomson \(sethomso\)" <sethomso at cisco.com>, "Fred Baker \(fred\)" <fred at cisco.com>, "v6ops-ads at tools.ietf.org" <v6ops-ads at tools.ietf.org>, "IETF at core3.amsl.com" <IETF at core3.amsl.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops at ops.ietf.org>, Mailing List <ipv6 at ietf.org>, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei at isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
- Delivered-to: ipv6 at core3.amsl.com
- In-reply-to: <AF742F21C1FCEE4DAB7F4842ABDC511C11DD08 at XMB-RCD-114.cisco.com>
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
- List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <AFC1ACFB-FDFA-482C-AAF9-7995F5CEFE1F at broadband-forum.org> <F311A255-3303-4C9D-B270-D1D23DE31E31 at cisco.com> <200911061358.nA6DwXNq025458 at cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <3C6F21684E7C954193E6C7C4573B76270367855A0E at IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG> <alpine.OSX.1.00.0911060823410.126 at cust11794.lava.net> <3C6F21684E7C954193E6C7C4573B76270367855B2F at IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A03037B07E3 at xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <3C6F21684E7C954193E6C7C4573B76270367855CA1 at IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG> <AF742F21C1FCEE4DAB7F4842ABDC511C11DCF6 at XMB-RCD-114.cisco.com> <3C6F21684E7C954193E6C7C4573B76270367855CBC at IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG> <AF742F21C1FCEE4DAB7F4842ABDC511C11DD08 at XMB-RCD-114.cisco.com>
- Thread-index: AcpfD9ATPsDVSCGmTqCpJYWjx52aqwABaHbAAAUHVrAAAurLsAACWa5AAACk0zAAAQdzgAABAHUA
- Thread-topic: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
Hemant,
Fair enough. I suppose that there are enough /55's or /56's that every household can have one; however, it does make "right sizing" the initial allocation to the ISP very important. We would not want to be allocating non-contiguous /28's on a regular basis :-)
Best Regards,
Jeffrey Dunn
Info Systems Eng., Lead
MITRE Corporation.
(301) 448-6965 (mobile)
-----Original Message-----
From: Hemant Singh (shemant) [mailto:shemant at cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 8:07 PM
To: Dunn, Jeffrey H.; Wes Beebee (wbeebee); Antonio Querubin
Cc: Thomas Narten; Fred Baker (fred); 6man-ads at tools.ietf.org; SAVI Mailing List; william.allen.simpson at gmail.com; Hesham Soliman; IETF at core3.amsl.com; Erik Nordmark; savi-ads at tools.ietf.org; IPv6 Operations; Susan Thomson (sethomso); v6ops-ads at tools.ietf.org; Robin Mersh; Mailing List; Susan at core3.amsl.com; JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
Subject: RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
Jeffrey,
The answer to your question is a yes. Alternatively, the ISP may just dole out a delegated prefix shorter than a /64 and the CPE Rtr has to live with it but the ISP may use something like a /55 that gives sufficient number of links in the home LAN. I will reply to any more discussion on this thread once I reach Hiroshima.
Hemant
-----Original Message-----
From: Dunn, Jeffrey H. [mailto:jdunn at mitre.org]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 7:31 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant); Wes Beebee (wbeebee); Antonio Querubin
Cc: Thomas Narten; Fred Baker (fred); 6man-ads at tools.ietf.org; SAVI Mailing List; william.allen.simpson at gmail.com; Hesham Soliman; IETF at core3.amsl.com; Erik Nordmark; savi-ads at tools.ietf.org; IPv6 Operations; Susan Thomson (sethomso); v6ops-ads at tools.ietf.org; Robin Mersh; Mailing List; Susan at core3.amsl.com; JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉; Dunn, Jeffrey H.
Subject: RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
OK. Then the CPE router has a unique /64 for all of its broadcast domains? Does that mean that the customer needs to tell the ISP how many /64 prefixes they need?
Best Regards,
Jeffrey Dunn
Info Systems Eng., Lead
MITRE Corporation.
(301) 448-6965 (mobile)
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.