IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Is there any router vendors supporting IPv6 Jumbogram?, knowme
• IP MIB issues, shawn . routhier
  • Re: IP MIB issues, Brian Haberman
• IPv6 w.g. minutes from the Seoul IETF, Bob Hinden
• Fwd: Any Meds You Want. Prescribed Online and Shipped to Your Door Discreetly., Phillip Munson
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-00.txt, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
• read it immediately, mmcmills
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • read it immediately, tmadore
  • read it immediately, jdeppe
  • read it immediately, calaveratur
  • read it immediately, u . investigativa
  • read it immediately, ksullivan-john
  • read it immediately, dhelberg
• Protocol Action: 'Management Information Base for the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• Re: [ppml] Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Michael . Dillon
• thanks, Gentry Difilippo
• fake, kcargill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • fake, jeadams
  • fake, nickgo
  • fake, jkettyle
  • fake, smccurdy
  • fake, stosh
• Deletion of auto configured link local address], Bhaskar S
• something for you, vospark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • something for you, pklapesky
  • something for you, support
  • something for you, info
  • something for you, editorial
  • something for you, lneumann
• Deletion of auto configured link local address, Suvendu M
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Deletion of auto configured link local address, Suresh Krishnan
• warning, ewauters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • warning, oe5
  • warning, cthiberville
  • warning, jeadams
  • warning, pfontaine
  • warning, mpeterson
  • warning, isa_medina_romero
  • warning, odriozola16
  • warning, info
  • warning, security
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-prefix-delegation-requirement-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-prefix-delegation-requirement-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
  • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Jari Arkko
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Margaret Wasserman
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Greg Daley
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Brian Haberman
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Alper Yegin
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ole Troan
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Jeroen Massar
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Fred Templin
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ralph Droms
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ole Troan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Soliman Hesham
    • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Brian Haberman
  • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Soliman Hesham
    • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
  • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Christian Huitema
    • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Jari Arkko
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Fred Templin
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ralph Droms
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Fred Templin
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ralph Droms
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Fred Templin
    • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
  • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Soliman Hesham
• simpler prefix delegation, Pekka Savola
  • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Shin Miyakawa
    • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Pekka Savola
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Ralph Droms
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Christian Strauf
  • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Ole Troan
    • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Pekka Savola
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Ole Troan
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Pekka Savola
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Ralph Droms
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Pekka Savola
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Ralph Droms
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Pekka Savola
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Ole Troan
  • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Laurent . Clevy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: simpler prefix delegation, matthew . ford
    • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Alain Durand
    • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: simpler prefix delegation, Byung-Yeob Kim
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Pekka Savola
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Ralph Droms
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Wataru Kawakami -ipv4-
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Fred Templin
  • RE: simpler prefix delegation, BINET David FTRD/DMI/CAE
  • RE: simpler prefix delegation, Christian Huitema
    • Re: simpler prefix delegation, Ole Troan
• ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Pekka Savola
    • Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Bill Manning
      • Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Bill Manning
      • Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: [ppml] Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, william(at)elan.net
      • Re: [ppml] Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Brian E Carpenter
• information, ccarey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • information, dwatkins
  • information, custserv
  • information, u . investigativa
• RE: [nemo] FW: Multiple DRs on a link, Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)
• stolen, swhitehead
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • stolen, dhickingbottom
  • stolen, pklapesky
  • stolen, jhedges
• unknown, sharz_94
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • unknown, rscott
  • unknown, ccarey
  • unknown, nickgo
• Virus Detected by Network Associates, Inc. Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR1a, Unknown
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Virus Detected by Network Associates, Inc. Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR1a, Unknown
  • Virus Detected by Network Associates, Inc. Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR1a, Unknown
• Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+, Christian Huitema
  • Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation ofdraft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+, Pekka Savola
  • Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+, Fred Templin
    • Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+, Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+, Mark Andrews
      • Re: Unique local & DNS (was: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt+, Stephen Sprunk
• hi, tmadore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • hi, eldora04
  • hi, swhitehead
  • hi, jhedges
  • hi, webnoticias
  • hi, lomadelchocho
  • hi, jeadams
  • hi, rveazey
  • hi, pliebst
  • hi, liwagner
  • hi, ewauters
  • hi, gmcdougal
  • Hi, Diann Post
  • hi, dhawal
• AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Margaret Wasserman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Margaret Wasserman
    • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Alain Durand
      • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Zefram
      • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Alain Durand
      • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Mark Andrews
      • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Rob Austein
• Web Based Pharmacy Overnights Meds To You, Lyle Jones
• Rx Savings up to 80%, Effie Rich
• comments on the tunnel-mib, Wes Hardaker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: comments on the tunnel-mib, Dave Thaler
    • Re: comments on the tunnel-mib, Wes Hardaker
• comments on ipCidrRouteNumber, Wes Hardaker
• Question regarding router redirect, Bhaskar S
  • Re: Question regarding router redirect, Mattias Pettersson
    • Re: Question regarding router redirect, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Re: reference dependency (DS to PS) (Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags andDHCPv6), Suresh Krishnan
  • Re: reference dependency (DS to PS) (Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Multiple DRs on a link, Mattias Pettersson
  • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Alper Yegin
    • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Erik Nordmark
  • Re: Multiple DRs on a link, Mohacsi Janos
    • Re: Multiple DRs on a link, Tim Chown
      • Re: Multiple DRs on a link, Tim Chown
      • Re: Multiple DRs on a link, Jari Arkko
    • Re: Multiple DRs on a link, Mattias Pettersson
      • Re: Multiple DRs on a link, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Soliman Hesham
  • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: Multiple DRs on a link, Jari Arkko
  • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: Multiple DRs on a link, Jari Arkko
  • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Soliman Hesham
    • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: Multiple DRs on a link, James Kempf
  • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)
  • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)
  • RE: Multiple DRs on a link, Soliman Hesham
• ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Jyrki Soini
  • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Jeroen Massar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Suresh Krishnan
    • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Jeroen Massar
      • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Suresh Krishnan
      • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Stephen Sprunk
      • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Suresh Krishnan
      • Message not available
      • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Jyrki Soini
      • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Jari Arkko
      • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Stig Venaas
      • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Stephen Sprunk
  • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Mukesh . Gupta
    • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Pekka Savola
  • RE: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Suresh Krishnan
    • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Stig Venaas
      • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Hoerdt Mickael
      • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Pekka Savola
    • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: ICMPv6 echo reply to multicast packet thread, Jyrki Soini
• Important notify about your e-mail account., support
• Re: IPv6 Overall Status document, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Drugs for Less.!, Betsy Hendrix
• unsubscription, Amy
• address selection, CTO YAN Renxiang
• RFC2461bis #256 RA Response Delay, Gregory Daley
• RFC2461bis #255 RA interval, Gregory Daley
• RFC2461bis Solicitation issues., Gregory Daley
  • RFC2461(bis) Issue - LLAO's for NS/NA, Fred Templin
    • Re: RFC2461(bis) Issue - LLAO's for NS/NA, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, Pekka Savola
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, Ralph Droms
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, Ralph Droms
      • reference dependency (DS to PS) (Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: reference dependency (DS to PS) (Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags andDHCPv6), Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, Dave Thaler
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, Dave Thaler
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, john . loughney
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, john . loughney
    • RE: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, Ralph Droms
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, john . loughney
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6, john . loughney
• FW: [dhcwg] comments on draft-vijay-dhc-dhcpv6-mcast-reconf-00, Bernie Volz
• RE: v6 host load balancing, Changming Liu
  • RE: v6 host load balancing, Pekka Savola
    • Re: v6 host load balancing, Tim Chown
    • RE: v6 host load balancing, Bob Hinden
      • RE: v6 host load balancing, Suresh Satapati
      • Re: v6 host load balancing, Tim Chown
  • RE: v6 host load balancing, Bob Hinden
    • RE: v6 host load balancing, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: v6 host load balancing, Changming Liu
  • RE: v6 host load balancing, Dave Thaler
  • RE: v6 host load balancing, Changming Liu
  • RE: v6 host load balancing, Dave Thaler
    • RE: v6 host load balancing, Suresh Satapati
      • RE: v6 host load balancing, Bob Hinden
      • RE: v6 host load balancing, Suresh Satapati
      • RE: v6 host load balancing, Pekka Savola
  • RE: v6 host load balancing, Changming Liu
  • RE: v6 host load balancing, Changming Liu
• ndproxy and SEND, Erik Nordmark
  • Re: ndproxy and SEND, James Kempf
    • Re: ndproxy and SEND, Fred Templin
      • Re: ndproxy and SEND, James Kempf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ndproxy and SEND, Christian Huitema
    • RE: ndproxy and SEND, Fred Templin
    • Re: ndproxy and SEND, James Kempf
      • Re: ndproxy and SEND, Jari Arkko
    • RE: ndproxy and SEND, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: ndproxy and SEND, James Kempf
  • RE: ndproxy and SEND, Christian Huitema
    • Re: ndproxy and SEND, James Kempf
  • RE: ndproxy and SEND, Dave Thaler
    • RE: ndproxy and SEND, Fred Templin
• RFC 3697 on IPv6 Flow Label Specification, rfc-editor
• "RFC 2461bis" issue: Proxy ND behavior, Ville Nuorvala
• [Administrativia] Virus on ipv6 at ietf.org (Was: ^_^ mew-mew (-: ), Jeroen Massar
• ^_^ mew-mew (-:, brian
• rfc2462bis: new section 5.7, Erik Nordmark
  • Re: rfc2462bis: new section 5.7, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: rfc2462bis: new section 5.7, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: rfc2462bis: new section 5.7, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2462bis: new section 5.7, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: rfc2462bis: new section 5.7, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Brian Haberman
  • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Francis Dupont
    • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Keith Moore
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Keith Moore
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Keith Moore
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Keith Moore
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, Keith Moore
    • Re: Adopt Address Selection API as a WG document?, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, Brian Haberman
  • Re: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, Pekka Savola
    • Re: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, Brian Haberman
  • Re: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, Brian Haberman
      • Re: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, Brian Haberman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, john . loughney
  • RE: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, Jung-Soo Park
    • RE: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, Pekka Savola
  • RE: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status, Dave Thaler
    • link-scoped multicast [RE: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status], Pekka Savola
      • Re: link-scoped multicast [RE: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status], Myung-Ki Shin
      • Re: link-scoped multicast [RE: IETF 59 IPv6 WG Document Status], Pekka Savola
• Updated IPv6 WG Agenda, Brian Haberman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Updated IPv6 WG Agenda, Brian Haberman
    • Re: Updated IPv6 WG Agenda, James Kempf
    • RE: Updated IPv6 WG Agenda, Soohong Daniel Park
    • Re: Updated IPv6 WG Agenda, Jaehoon Paul Jeong
    • RE: Updated IPv6 WG Agenda (IPv6 over WLAN/802.11), Soohong Daniel Park
• icmpv6-v3 comment, Jyrki Soini
  • Re: icmpv6-v3 comment, Pekka Savola
    • Re: icmpv6-v3 comment, Mohacsi Janos
  • Re: icmpv6-v3 comment, Stephen Sprunk
• Fioricet, Ambien, Buspar, Prozac, and more Prescribed ..., Jess Ruiz
• RE: [2461bis issue 250] Reception of prefix option with prefix length > 64, Soliman Hesham
• additional agenda item, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: additional agenda item, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: additional agenda item, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: additional agenda item, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: additional agenda item, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: additional agenda item, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
      • Re: additional agenda item, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
  • API extension to get IP addresses (Re: additional agenda item), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: API extension to get IP addresses, SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro
      • Re: API extension to get IP addresses, SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro
• Re :Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, PARK SOO HONG
• icmpv6-v3 comments, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: icmpv6-v3 comments, Mukesh . Gupta
    • RE: icmpv6-v3 comments, Pekka Savola
  • RE: icmpv6-v3 comments, Mukesh . Gupta
    • RE: icmpv6-v3 comments, Pekka Savola
  • RE: icmpv6-v3 comments, Mukesh . Gupta
• router-selection comments, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: router-selection comments, Dave Thaler
    • RE: router-selection comments, Pekka Savola
• draft-ietf-ipv6-host-load-sharing-01 comments, Pekka Savola
• draft-itojun-ipv6-getnameinfo-multiproto-01.txt comments, Pekka Savola
• Fw: Declined Application, Ahmir Mcgarrah
• Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Dan Lanciani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", jarno . rajahalme
    • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Charles E. Perkins
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Bob Hinden
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Fred Templin
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Dan Lanciani
• [psg.com #324], rt+ipv6-2462bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #324], rt+ipv6-2462bis
• [psg.com #270] Semantics of L=0 and A=1 scenario, rt+ipv6-2462bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #270] Semantics of L=0 and A=1 scenario, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• [psg.com #269] Deprecated Address Handling, rt+ipv6-2462bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #269] Deprecated Address Handling, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• [psg.com #268] Deprecated Addresses and Source address selection, rt+ipv6-2462bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #268] Deprecated Addresses and Source address selection, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• [psg.com #267] Site Local Addresses, rt+ipv6-2462bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #267] Site Local Addresses, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• [psg.com #266] Stored Lifetime, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• [psg.com #265] Inbound NA processing, rt+ipv6-2462bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #265] Inbound NA processing, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• Big savings on cigarettes, Burt Piper
• [rfc2462bis issue 277] M/O flags and DHCPv6, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 277] M/O flags and DHCPv6, Ralph Droms
  • [rfc2462bis] Absence of Router Advertisements, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 277] M/O flags and DHCPv6, john . loughney
• [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Pekka Savola
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, James Kempf
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Keith Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Keith Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Bound, Jim
  • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Barany, Pete
    • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 281] Requirement for 64bit I/F ID, Pekka Savola
• Re: [Mobopts] consecutive FMIP-handovers, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
  • Re: [Mobopts] consecutive FMIP-handovers, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
• IPv6 WG: Call for Scribes, Brian Haberman
• Appeal Response - Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian Haberman
  • Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
    • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", itojun
    • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Thomas Narten
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Thomas Narten
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Thomas Narten
      • Re: Appeal on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
• here is the Rx information you requested, Vincent Duvall
• [psg.com #264] Dead code in DoS Algorithm, rt+ipv6-2462bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #264] Dead code in DoS Algorithm, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Francis Dupont
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Francis Dupont
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Greg Daley
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Francis Dupont
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Jari Arkko
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Greg Daley
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Francis Dupont
      • Re: Optimistic DAD _still_!, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Francis Dupont
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Jari Arkko
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Jari Arkko
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Francis Dupont
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Francis Dupont
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Jari Arkko
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Francis Dupont
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Brian Haberman
      • Re: Optimistic DAD _still!_, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: Optimistic DAD _still_!, Jari Arkko
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, James Kempf
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Markku Savela
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Markku Savela
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Defending against DIID (was Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD textinconsistencies), Greg Daley
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Greg Daley
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, James Kempf
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Greg Daley
      • SEND and DIID-compatible DAD rule (was [rfc2462bis issue 275] DADtext inconsistencies), Jari Arkko
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), James Kempf
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), James Kempf
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), James Kempf
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), James Kempf
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), James Kempf
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), James Kempf
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275]DAD text inconsistencies), Mika Liljeberg
      • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, S. Daniel Park
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue275] DAD text inconsistencies), Mika Liljeberg
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Mika Liljeberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Suresh Krishnan
• comments on draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-04.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, S. Daniel Park
    • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: comments on draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-04.txt, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
• FW: [DNA] IETF 59 Session [IPv6 DAD Optimization Goals andRequirements], S. Daniel Park
  • Re: [DNA] IETF 59 Session [IPv6 DAD Optimization Goals and Requirements], Pekka Nikander