IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, (continued)
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue275] DAD text inconsistencies), Mika Liljeberg
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Mika Liljeberg
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies, Suresh Krishnan
• comments on draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-04.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, S. Daniel Park
    • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: comments on draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-04.txt, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
• FW: [DNA] IETF 59 Session [IPv6 DAD Optimization Goals andRequirements], S. Daniel Park
  • Re: [DNA] IETF 59 Session [IPv6 DAD Optimization Goals and Requirements], Pekka Nikander
• Protocol Action: 'IP Forwarding Table MIB' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• Another cigarette tax increase in your state?...order them online, Jessie Hoffman
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2012-update-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Call for Scribes, Brian Haberman
• Tentative Agenda for Seoul, Brian Haberman
• Re: thanks!               ! thesis bitchinesses antiserums polymerase windowpane histochemic asceticism dualism bairns, Marquashia Brunson
• Internetworking 2004: May 13-14, 2004, Las Vegas, CAITR
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Internetworking 2004: May 13-14, 2004, Las Vegas, CAITR
• Optimistic DAD _again!_, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
  • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, James Kempf
  • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
    • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, James Kempf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
  • RE: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
    • RE: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
  • Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_, Gregory Daley
• 2461bis, Soliman Hesham
• Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Brian Haberman
  • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
    • RE: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Tony Hain
      • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Bill Manning
      • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Fred Templin
      • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Bill Manning
      • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Tim Chown
      • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Fred Templin
    • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Fred Templin
      • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Alain Durand
  • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Dan Lanciani
    • RE: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Dan Lanciani
    • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Bill Manning
  • RE: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Dan Lanciani
    • RE: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Jeroen Massar
  • RE: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Dan Lanciani
    • RE: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Jeroen Massar
  • Re: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", Dan Lanciani
• Re: please, Suzanne Downing
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt, Mark_Andrews
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt, john . loughney
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt, Mark Andrews
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt, john . loughney
    • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt, Chris Yarnell
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Last Call: 'Deprecating Site Local Addresses' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• a new revision of the scoping-arch draft, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• responses to comments on the scope-arch document, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Updated Node Requirements, john . loughney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Updated Node Requirements, john . loughney
• RFC2461: be more clearer about TLL option in NA, Yukiyo Akisada
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RFC2461: be more clearer about TLL option in NA, Soliman Hesham
• Re: Propecia!       bimetall!ics congest hormone satan amateurishness, Marangely Ingraham
• Re: you must see, Fabian Mackey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: you must see, Stewart Beesley
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: [node req] Should I include points to current set of draft upd ates?, john . loughney
  • Re: [node req] Should I include points to current set of draft updates?, Jari Arkko
• [node req] Should I include points to current set of draft updates?, john . loughney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [node req] Should I include points to current set of draft updates?, Jari Arkko
• [node req] Question on Security considerations., john . loughney
  • Re: [node req] Question on Security considerations., Russ Housley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [node req] Question on Security considerations., john . loughney
• [psg.com #259] [2461bis issue 259] Add flags from MIPv6 spec, rt+ipv6-2461bis
• [psg.com #246] [2461bisissue 246] Preferred lifetime > valid lifetime, rt+ipv6-2461bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #246] [2461bisissue 246] Preferred lifetime > valid lifetime, rt+ipv6-2461bis
    • Re: [psg.com #246] [2461bisissue 246] Preferred lifetime > valid lifetime, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • RE: [psg.com #246] [2461bisissue 246] Preferred lifetime > valid lifetime, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: [psg.com #246] [2461bisissue 246] Preferred lifetime > valid lifetime, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• [psg.com #248] [2461bis issue 248] Inconsistencies in router lifetime values, rt+ipv6-2461bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #248] [2461bis issue 248] Inconsistencies in router lifetime values, rt+ipv6-2461bis
• [psg.com #247] [2461bis issue 247] On-link assumption harmful for dual stack nodes, rt+ipv6-2461bis
  • Re: [psg.com #247] [2461bis issue 247] On-link assumption harmfulfor dual stack nodes, Pekka Savola
• experimental registry, Zefram
• Re :rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression, Syam Madanpalli
• ICMPv3: Security Consideration Section., Mukesh . Gupta
  • Re: ICMPv3: Security Consideration Section., Jari Arkko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ICMPv3: Security Consideration Section., Mukesh . Gupta
  • RE: ICMPv3: Security Consideration Section., Mukesh . Gupta
    • Re: ICMPv3: Security Consideration Section., Jari Arkko
• Re: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., srihari varada
  • Re: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., Francis Dupont
  • RE: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., Anil Kumar Reddy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., Karim El-Malki (HF/EAB)
  • RE: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., Barany, Pete
    • RE: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., Pekka Savola
  • RE: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., Barany, Pete
  • FW: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., Barany, Pete
    • Re: FW: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., Pekka Savola
  • RE: FW: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., Barany, Pete
  • Re: updates to IPv6 over PPP spec., srihari varada
• [node req] Issue37: EDNS0 support, john . loughney
  • Re: [node req] Issue37: EDNS0 support, Bob Hinden
    • Re: [node req] Issue37: EDNS0 support, Francis Dupont
      • Re: [node req] Issue37: EDNS0 support, Pekka Savola
      • Re: [node req] Issue37: EDNS0 support, Francis Dupont
      • Re: [node req] Issue37: EDNS0 support, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: [node req] Issue37: EDNS0 support, Rob Austein
      • Re: [node req] Issue37: EDNS0 support, Bob Hinden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [node req] Issue37: EDNS0 support, john . loughney
• [node req] issue 36 - mib issues, john . loughney
• [node req] issue 35 - toc, john . loughney
• [node req] Issue 34: security issues, john . loughney
• Issue 33: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, john . loughney
• ed nits:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, john . loughney
• [rfc2461bis issue 252] Security considerations issues, Soliman Hesham
  • Re: [rfc2461bis issue 252] Security considerations issues, Jari Arkko
  • Re: [rfc2461bis issue 252] Security considerations issues, James Kempf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rfc2461bis issue 252] Security considerations issues, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: [rfc2461bis issue 252] Security considerations issues, James Kempf
  • RE: [rfc2461bis issue 252] Security considerations issues, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: [rfc2461bis issue 252] Security considerations issues, James Kempf
      • Re: [rfc2461bis issue 252] Security considerations issues, Steven M. Bellovin
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• new revision of rfc2462bis is available, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: new revision of rfc2462bis is available, Felipe Alfaro Solana
    • Re: new revision of rfc2462bis is available, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression, Ole Troan
    • Re: rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression, Michael Hunter
      • Re: rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression, Ole Troan
      • Re: rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression, Greg Daley
      • Re: rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression, Ole Troan
      • Re: rfc2462bis -- loopback suppression, Greg Daley
• [2461bis issue 250] Reception of prefix option with prefix length > 64, Soliman Hesham
  • Re: [2461bis issue 250] Reception of prefix option with prefix length > 64, Markku Savela
  • Re: [2461bis issue 250] Reception of prefix option with prefix length > 64, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: [2461bis issue 250] Reception of prefix option with prefix length > 64, Erik Nordmark
• Request To Advance : "Deprecating Site Local Addresses", Brian Haberman
• [psg.com #321] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, rt+ipv6-2462bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #321] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• [psg.com #276] Possible DoS Attacks, rt+ipv6-2462bis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [psg.com #276] Possible DoS Attacks, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• [rfc2462bis] obsolete text in the interface id definition, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] obsolete text in the interface id definition, john . loughney
• Discontinuity timer for TCP-MIB counters, Rajiv Raghunarayan
  • Re: [ipv6mib] Discontinuity timer for TCP-MIB counters, Juergen Schoenwaelder
    • Re: [ipv6mib] Discontinuity timer for TCP-MIB counters, Rajiv Raghunarayan
• RE: [ipv6mib] Discontinuity timer for TCP-MIB counters, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
• [no subject], Unknown
• [rfc2462bis] still open issues, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• [rfc2462bis issue 276] possible DoS due to the two-hour rule, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• [rfc2462bis issue 280] interface failure upon DAD failure, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 280] interface failure upon DAD failure, Soliman Hesham
  • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 280] interface failure upon DAD failure, john . loughney
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 280] interface failure upon DAD failure, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 280] interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
  • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 280] interface failure upon DAD failure, john . loughney
• [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", Russell Brian
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", Erik Nordmark
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", Fred Templin
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", Erik Nordmark
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Reminder: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", Jari Arkko
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rfc2462bis issue 278] 2462bis for "routers", Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)
• [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Markku Savela
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Greg Daley
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Jari Arkko
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Brian Haberman
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Fred Templin
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Brian Haberman
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Greg Daley
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Brian Haberman
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Brian Haberman
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Jari Arkko
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Brian Haberman
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Markku Savela
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Brian Haberman
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Markku Savela
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Brian Haberman
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Jari Arkko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Gregory Daley
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Jari Arkko
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Gregory Daley
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 274] conflict between MLD and NS delay, Gregory Daley
• FWD: [Internet-Draft Submission Cutoff Dates for the 59th IETF Meeting in Seoul..], Bob Hinden
• [rfc2462bis issue 271] retaining addresses in stable storage, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 271] retaining addresses in stable storage, Jari Arkko
    • Re: [rfc2462bis issue 271] retaining addresses in stable storage, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• a summary of proposals for rfc2462bis, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-06.txt, Brian Haberman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-06.txt, shawn . routhier
• Issue Tracker for 2461 and 2462 updates, Brian Haberman
• SIOCGIFaaa ioctls and IPv6 interfaces, Kristine Adamson
  • Re: SIOCGIFaaa ioctls and IPv6 interfaces, Mark . Andrews
    • Re: SIOCGIFaaa ioctls and IPv6 interfaces, Kristine Adamson
      • Re: SIOCGIFaaa ioctls and IPv6 interfaces, Mark . Andrews
      • Re: SIOCGIFaaa ioctls and IPv6 interfaces, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: SIOCGIFaaa ioctls and IPv6 interfaces, Kristine Adamson
      • Re: SIOCGIFaaa ioctls and IPv6 interfaces, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, Jari Arkko
    • Re: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, Francis Dupont
    • Re: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • [rfc2462bis issue 276] possible DoS due to the two-hour rule (Re: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • RE: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, S. Daniel Park
    • Re: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • RE: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, S. Daniel Park
  • Re: [2462bis] preferred lifetime and the 'two-hour' rule, Erik Nordmark
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-host-load-sharing-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
• reference from ipv6-scoping-arch to ipaddr-text-rep, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• scope zone ID zero as the default (for revision of ipv6-scoping-arch), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: scope zone ID zero as the default (for revision of ipv6-scoping-arch), Juergen Schoenwaelder
• a new revision of ipv6-scoping-arch-00, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: a new revision of ipv6-scoping-arch-00, Markku Savela
    • Re: a new revision of ipv6-scoping-arch-00, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: a new revision of ipv6-scoping-arch-00, Pekka Savola
    • Re: a new revision of ipv6-scoping-arch-00, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Account Pastdue boot boleros gog pinwheel stationarity, Eusebio Leak
• RE: Microsoft Security Resolution KB303663, Jeroen Massar
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, C. M. Heard
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Brian Haberman
      • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Juergen Schoenwaelder
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, C. M. Heard
      • problem with inetCidrRouteDest/inetCidrRoutePfxLen consistency checklanguage in draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, C. M. Heard
      • Re: problem with inetCidrRouteDest/inetCidrRoutePfxLen consistencycheck language in draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Brian Haberman
      • Re: problem with inetCidrRouteDest/inetCidrRoutePfxLen consistency check language in draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Juergen Schoenwaelder
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Juergen Schoenwaelder
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
    • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Juergen Schoenwaelder
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
    • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, C. M. Heard
      • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, Brian Haberman
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, shawn . routhier
  • RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt, shawn . routhier
• ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Mukesh . Gupta
  • Re: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
  • Re: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Bill Sommerfeld
  • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, marcelo bagnulo
    • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Pekka Savola
      • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, marcelo bagnulo
      • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Pekka Savola
      • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, marcelo bagnulo
  • Re: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Mukesh . Gupta
  • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Christian Huitema
    • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, marcelo bagnulo
    • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Pekka Savola
  • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Christian Huitema
  • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Mukesh . Gupta
    • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, marcelo bagnulo
      • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Pekka Savola
  • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Christian Huitema
    • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Bob Hinden
    • Learning a valid prefix (Re: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes), Greg Daley
  • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Christian Huitema
  • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Mukesh . Gupta
    • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, marcelo bagnulo
  • RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes, Mukesh . Gupta
• IPv6 Work Group Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-inet-tunnel-mib-00.txt, Brian Haberman
• IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Brian Haberman
  • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Geoff Huston
  • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Alain Durand
  • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Pekka Savola
    • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Christian Huitema
    • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Alain Durand
  • RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Christian Huitema
  • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Bob Hinden
    • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Pekka Savola
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Bob Hinden
      • implemenation req. vs operational advice [Re: IPv6 WG LastCall:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt], Pekka Savola
    • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Bob Hinden
  • RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Christian Huitema
    • RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Bob Hinden
    • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Alain Durand
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Hans Kruse
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Zefram
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Tim Chown
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Alain Durand
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Bill Manning
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Alain Durand
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Tim Chown
  • RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Christian Huitema
    • RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Bob Hinden
  • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Dan Lanciani
    • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Alain Durand
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Tim Chown
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Steven Blake
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Bill Manning
      • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Zefram
  • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Dan Lanciani
  • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Dan Lanciani
    • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Zefram
  • Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Dan Lanciani
• assiduous act, Stephan Keyes
• pontific bilabial, Terra Booker
• weight |oss, Yolanda Washburn
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt, Bob Hinden
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-inet-tunnel-mib-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• fast weight |oss j6i, Lucy Rollins
• ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Mukesh . Gupta
  • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Fred Templin
    • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Pekka Savola
      • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Fred Templin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Mukesh . Gupta
    • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Fred Templin
      • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Pekka Savola
      • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Fred Templin
      • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Pekka Savola
      • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Fred Templin
      • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Brian Haberman
      • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Test (final ??), Fred Templin
• IPv6 over PPP, srihari varada
• Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text (2), Sellers, Julian P
  • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text (2), Pekka Savola
    • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text (2), Fred Templin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text (2), Mukesh . Gupta
  • RE: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text (2), Sellers, Julian P
    • RE: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text (2), Pekka Savola
• RE: Proposal for rate limiting parameters, Mukesh . Gupta
  • RE: Proposal for rate limiting parameters, Bob Hinden
• ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text, Mukesh . Gupta
  • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text, Fred Templin
  • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text, Zachary Amsden
    • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text, Fred Templin
  • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text, Zachary Amsden
  • Re: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text (2), Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text, Mukesh . Gupta
    • RE: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text, Fred Templin
  • RE: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text, Mukesh . Gupta
  • RE: ICMPv6 Rate Limiting Methods: Revised Text, Bound, Jim
    • Proposal for rate limiting parameters, Fred Templin
      • Re: Proposal for rate limiting parameters, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Proposal for rate limiting parameters, Fred Templin
      • Re: Proposal for rate limiting parameters, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Proposal for rate limiting parameters, Fred Templin
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Update IPv6 over ppp, Soohong Daniel Park
  • Re: Update IPv6 over ppp, Brian Haberman
• draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Mukesh . Gupta
  • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Francis Dupont
    • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Pekka Savola
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Francis Dupont
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Pekka Savola
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Fred Templin
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Pekka Savola
  • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Margaret Wasserman
    • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Brian Haberman
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Pekka Savola
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Fred Templin
    • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Fred Templin
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Yasuhiro Ohara
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Mukesh . Gupta
    • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Fred Templin
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Pekka Savola
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Fred Templin
  • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, teemu . savolainen
    • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Fred Templin
  • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Mukesh . Gupta
    • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Bob Hinden
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Tim Chown
  • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Mukesh . Gupta
    • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Fred Templin
      • Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Pekka Savola
  • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Mukesh . Gupta
  • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Mukesh . Gupta
  • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Mukesh . Gupta
  • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Mukesh . Gupta
    • RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods, Fred Templin
• RE: Path MTU in node-requirements [was Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt ], john . loughney
• FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, john . loughney
  • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Jari Arkko
    • Path MTU in node-requirements [was Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt ], Thomas Narten
      • Re: Path MTU in node-requirements [was Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt], Jari Arkko
  • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Mark . Andrews
    • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Pekka Savola
      • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Mans Nilsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Mark . Andrews
  • RE: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, john . loughney
    • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Mans Nilsson
      • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Thomas Narten
      • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Fred Templin
      • Re: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Mark . Andrews
    • RE: FW: Evaluation of: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Pekka Savola
• doubt regarding socket options, Jayabharathi
  • Re: doubt regarding socket options, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Recommended RFCs, José María Mateos
  • Re: Recommended RFCs, Mark Smith
    • Re: Recommended RFCs, Tim Chown
  • Re: Recommended RFCs, Jari Arkko
• Protocol Action: 'IPv6 Flow Label Specification' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• Format Prefix, Frank P. Troy
  • RE: Format Prefix, Tony Hain
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-router-selection-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-router-selection-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Erik Nordmark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Bound, Jim
    • Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Bound, Jim
• Question about Interface ID length, Barany, Pete
  • Re: Question about Interface ID length, Brian Haberman
  • Re: Question about Interface ID length, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Question about Interface ID length, Brian Haberman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Question about Interface ID length, Barany, Pete
  • RE: Question about Interface ID length, Barany, Pete
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-flow-label-09.txt, Internet-Drafts
• getnameinfo and various protocol types, itojun
  • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Andrew White
    • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Andrew White
  • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Peter Lei
    • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
  • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Joshua Graessley
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Peter Lei
      • comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, itojun
      • Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Fred Templin
      • Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Thomas Narten
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Suresh Krishnan
    • Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
  • RE: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Bound, Jim
  • RE: getnameinfo and various protocol types, Bound, Jim
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: REVISED Last Call: 'Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP)' to Proposed Standard, Dave Thaler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: REVISED Last Call: 'Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP)' to Proposed Standard, Dave Thaler
• Draft IPv6 Minutes from Minneapolis IETF, Bob Hinden
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2012-update-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2012-update-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• ND model for routers, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
• a question on IPv6CP, CTO WEI Renxiang
• Sending Fragmented packets, Suvendu M
  • Re: Sending Fragmented packets, Jari Arkko
  • Re: Sending Fragmented packets, Keshava
• Nicholas Carbone/Poughkeepsie/IBM is out of the office., Nicholas Carbone
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Nicholas Carbone/Poughkeepsie/IBM is out of the office., Nicholas Carbone
• comments on rfc2011 update, Wes Hardaker
  • Re: comments on rfc2011 update, Brian Haberman
    • Re: comments on rfc2011 update, Shawn A. Routhier
      • Re: comments on rfc2011 update, Wes Hardaker
      • Re: comments on rfc2011 update, Juergen Schoenwaelder
      • Re: comments on rfc2011 update, Shawn A. Routhier
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-vijay-ipv6-icmp-refresh-otherconf-00.txt], Vijayabhaskar A K
  • RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-vijay-ipv6-icmp-refresh-otherconf-00.txt], Soohong Daniel Park
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-vijay-ipv6-icmp-refresh-otherconf-00.txt], Tim Chown
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-vijay-ipv6-icmp-refresh-otherconf-00.txt], matthew . ford
• "ROUTERS" vs. "routers", Fred Templin
  • Re: "ROUTERS" vs. "routers", Havard Eidnes
  • Re: "ROUTERS" vs. "routers", Fred Templin
  • Re: "ROUTERS" vs. "routers", Nick 'Sharkey' Moore