IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- Re: Doubt in Router Advertisement Message, (continued)
FW: draft-dec-6man-rs-access-harmful,
Wojciech Dec
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nordmark-6man-impatient-nud-01.txt,
Erik Nordmark
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lynn-6man-6lobac-00.txt,
Kerry Lynn
[Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-07.txt],
Brian E Carpenter
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-07.txt,
internet-drafts
[Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04.txt],
Brian E Carpenter
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04.txt,
internet-drafts
subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Roland Bless
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Randy Bush
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Randy Bush
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Cameron Byrne
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Smith
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Smith
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Smith
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Smith
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Randy Bush
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Townsley
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Ole Troan
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Randy Bush
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Smith
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Randy Bush
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Townsley
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Townsley
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Smith
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Karl Auer
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Sander Steffann
- Re: subnet router anycast,
james woodyatt
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Roland Bless
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Randy Bush
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Roland Bless
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Mark Smith
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: subnet router anycast,
Alastair Johnson
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-04.txt,
internet-drafts
6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-03.txt>,
Bob Hinden
6MAN WG Last Call: <>,
Bob Hinden
new draft: draft-gashinsky-v6nd-enhance-00,
Joel Jaeggli
Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt> (IPv6 Flow Label Specification) to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
[Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt],
Brian E Carpenter
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt,
internet-drafts
Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11.txt> (IPv6 Node Requirements) to Informational RFC,
The IESG
Fwd: Please help the Nomcom,
Brian Haberman
rfc3484-bis issue 2: privacy addresses,
Tim Chown
rfc3484-bis issue 3: prefer greatest prefix lifetime?,
Tim Chown
rfc3484-bis issue 1: deprecated prefixes,
Tim Chown
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-01.txt,
internet-drafts
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-03.txt,
internet-drafts
TTL/hopcount becomes 0, what to send back, original packet with TTL = 1 or the one with TTL = 0?,
Jeroen Massar
AD review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis,
Jari Arkko
Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-06.txt> (Rationale for update to the IPv6 flow label specification) to Informational RFC,
The IESG
Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-03.txt> (Using the IPv6 flow label for equal cost multipath routing and link aggregation in tunnels) to BCP,
The IESG
[Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-03.txt],
Brian E Carpenter
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-03.txt,
internet-drafts
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-dad-proxy-01.txt,
internet-drafts
AD review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-update,
Jari Arkko
AD review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp,
Jari Arkko
AD review of draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option,
Jari Arkko
Re: [v6ops] Question regarding Ra-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
RJ Atkinson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
RJ Atkinson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Joel Jaeggli
- RE: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Ted Lemon
- RE: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Ted Lemon
- RE: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
RJ Atkinson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
RJ Atkinson
- Re: [v6ops] Question regarding RA-Guard evasion (ND and extension headers),
Ray Hunter
AD review of draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header,
Jari Arkko
Question regarding Ra-Guard evasion (ND and extensio headers),
Fernando Gont
Re: [v6ops] Question regarding Ra-Guard evasion (ND and extensio headers),
Jean-Michel Combes
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-03.txt,
internet-drafts
Agenda requests for IETF 81,
Brian Haberman
Re: [v6ops] Ra-Guard evasion (new Internet-Drafts),
Fernando Gont
Request To Advance: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-04.txt,
Brian Haberman
Request To Advance: draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-06.txt,
Brian Haberman
Request To Advance:draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-02.txt,
Brian Haberman
ITU-T SG17 IPv6 security work items liaison,
Stephen Farrell
Re: Ra-Guard evasion (new Internet-Drafts),
Karl Auer
Preliminary report on flow label hash algorithms,
Brian E Carpenter
New I-D: Neighbor Discovery and IPv6 Extension Headers (draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers),
Fernando Gont
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11.txt,
internet-drafts
Re: [ipv6] Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Ray Hunter
- Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Fred Baker
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Ray Hunter
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
james woodyatt
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Mark Smith
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Ralph Droms
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Ralph Droms
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Ray Hunter
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Ray Hunter
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Thomas Narten
- Re: Multiple addresses [was Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD],
Ralph Droms
Re: [ipv6] Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Markus Hanauska
Thomas Narten <narten at us.ibm.com>,
Ray Hunter
Node Requirements: Revised text for DHCP on routers,
Thomas Narten
review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Jari Arkko
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Thomas Narten
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
RJ Atkinson
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Thomas Narten
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Bob Hinden
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Mark Smith
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Thomas Narten
- RE: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Brian Haberman
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Timothy Winters
- RE: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
STARK, BARBARA H (ATTSI)
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Ralph Droms
- RE: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
STARK, BARBARA H (ATTSI)
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Ralph Droms
- RE: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Mark Smith
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Doug Barton
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Mark Smith
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Doug Barton
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Cutler James R
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
Ray Hunter
- Re: review of draft-ietf-node-req-bis,
RJ Atkinson
Request To Advance: <draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-10.txt>,
Bob Hinden
[6man] New Version Notification for draft-nordmark-6man-impatient-nud-00.txt,
Ray Hunter
Neighbor Unreachability Detection is too impatient,
Erik Nordmark
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-10.txt,
internet-drafts
Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming,
Brian Haberman
Fwd: DNS configuration for Wireless networks using Router Advertisement,
Bruno Silvestre
Adapting draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming as a WG item,
Richard Hartmann
RFC3484, Section 6, Rule 7 and ISATAP,
Templin, Fred L
Re: moving DHCPv6 to SHOULD,
RJ Atkinson
USGv6 Version 2.0 Call For Community Input,
Stephen Nightingale
Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Thomas Narten
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Ralph Droms
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Cameron Byrne
- RE: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Bob Hinden
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Thomas Narten
- RE: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Brzozowski, John
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Thomas Narten
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Ralph Droms
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Christopher Morrow
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Thomas Narten
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mark Smith
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mark Smith
- RE: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Christopher Morrow
- Message not available
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Tim Chown
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mark Smith
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Markus Hanauska
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Philip Homburg
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Philip Homburg
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Markus Hanauska
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Philip Homburg
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Markus Hanauska
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mohacsi Janos
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Markus Hanauska
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Philip Homburg
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mohacsi Janos
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Markus Hanauska
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Philip Homburg
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Markus Hanauska
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mohacsi Janos
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Markus Hanauska
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mohacsi Janos
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Philip Homburg
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Markus Hanauska
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Philip Homburg
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Philip Homburg
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Philip Homburg
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mohacsi Janos
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mohacsi Janos
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Christopher Morrow
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Thomas Narten
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Christopher Morrow
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Thomas Narten
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Carsten Bormann
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
james woodyatt
- RE: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
john.loughney
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Thomas Narten
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mark Smith
- RE: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Doug Barton
- Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mark Smith
RE: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
john.loughney
Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Timothy E. Enos
Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Alexandru Petrescu
Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Suresh Krishnan
Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Randy Bush
Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Brzozowski, John
RE: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
Christopher Palmer
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD,
RJ Atkinson
Flow label drafts updated again,
Brian E Carpenter
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-06.txt,
internet-drafts
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-04.txt,
internet-drafts
OT -- Nokia v6 support -- was Re: Short 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-09.txt>,
Cameron Byrne
Re: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise at tools.ietf.org,
Ray Hunter
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-6man-udpzero-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-09.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Flow label drafts updated,
Brian E Carpenter
Mail converted by MHonArc
