IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: [I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt], (continued)
  • Re: [I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt], Steven Blake
• Updating the Node Requirements document, john . loughney
• Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, john . loughney
  • Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, Thomas Narten
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, john . loughney
    • Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, Thomas Narten
    • Re: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, Brian Haberman
  • RE: Node Req: Issue27: 11. Security Considerations, john . loughney
• Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, john . loughney
  • Re: Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, Thomas Narten
    • Re: Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, Brian Haberman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, john . loughney
  • RE: Node Req: Issue26: 9.1.1 IPv6 Router Alert Option - RFC2711, john . loughney
• Node Req: Issue25: 6.1 Transition Mechanisms, john . loughney
• Node Req: Issue24: 5.3 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) - RFC3315, john . loughney
• Node Req: Issue23: DNS issues, john . loughney
  • Re: Node Req: Issue23: DNS issues, Thomas Narten
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Node Req: Issue23: DNS issues, john . loughney
• Node Req: Issue22: 4.5.4 Default Address Selection for IPv6 - RFC3484 text, john . loughney
  • Re: Node Req: Issue22: 4.5.4 Default Address Selection for IPv6 - RFC3484 text, Thomas Narten
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Node Req: Issue22: 4.5.4 Default Address Selection for IPv6 - RFC3484 text, john . loughney
• Issue21: Section 4.2: Prefix discovery & DAD, john . loughney
• Issue20: Sect. 4.2 disabling Router Discovery, john . loughney
• Issue 19: AD review of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, john . loughney
  • Issue 19 of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, Thomas Narten
    • Re: Issue 19 of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt, Jari Arkko
• RE: Node requirement nits (was: AD review of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt), john . loughney
• RE: Mobility text in node reqts (Was: AD review of draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt), john . loughney
• Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Brian Haberman
  • Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Pekka Savola
    • Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Brian Haberman
      • Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, James Kempf
      • RE: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Soohong Daniel Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Brian Haberman
    • Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration, Fred Templin
• Note on id/loc separation discussion, Brian Haberman
  • Re: Note on id/loc separation discussion, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: Note on id/loc separation discussion, Brian Haberman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Note on id/loc separation discussion, Michel Py
• RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Write-ups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
  • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Write-ups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Write-ups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Write-ups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
• [no subject], Unknown
• Renewed HIP mailing list & BOF and WG proposals, Pekka Nikander
• OT: Argh, mea culpa ;_; (was Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?)), Eugene M. Kim
• comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, BAUDOT Alain FTRD/DMI/CAE
  • Re: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, BAUDOT Alain FTRD/DMI/CAE
    • RE: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, Pekka Savola
      • RE: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, Pekka Savola
      • Re: comment/question on deprecate-site-local-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
• why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Pekka Savola
  • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Geoff Huston
  • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Erik Nordmark
    • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michael Thomas
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Mark Smith
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michael Thomas
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Benny Amorsen
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Eliot Lear
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Ralph Droms
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Eliot Lear
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Pekka Savola
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Mark Smith
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Ralph Droms
      • Re: why market picked up NATs, Andrew White
      • Prefix Delegation and Cascading [was why market picked up NATs], Bob Hinden
      • Re: Prefix Delegation and Cascading [was why market picked up NATs], Pekka Savola
      • Re: why market picked up NATs, Antonio Querubin
      • Re: why market picked up NATs, Lutz Pressler
      • Re: why market picked up NATs, Antonio Querubin
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Mark Smith
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Thomas Narten
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Erik Nordmark
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Fred Templin
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Bob Hinden
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Mark Smith
    • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Kurt Erik Lindqvist
    • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Tony Hain
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Ron Lee
    • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
      • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Christian de Larrinaga
      • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Amoakoh Gyasi-Agyei
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
    • Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Eliot Lear
    • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Måns Nilsson
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
    • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Måns Nilsson
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
    • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Tony Hain
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Christian Huitema
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Michel Py
  • RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?], Christian Huitema
• RE: APIs, locator-identifiers, DNS security, [and Cartesius] (was Re: A strawman analysis...), Bound, Jim
• comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Pekka Savola
  • Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Pekka Savola
      • Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Margaret Wasserman
      • Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Tim Chown
      • Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: comments on deprecate-site-local-00, Måns Nilsson
• Results of Poll, Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman
  • Re: Results of Poll, Hans Kruse
• What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Pekka Nikander
  • Re: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Keith Moore
    • Re: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Pekka Nikander
  • Re: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Erik Nordmark
  • Re: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Dave Crocker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What end-point identifiers are needed for?, Michel Py
• RE: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Michel Py
• RE: About identifiers, HITs, and security (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Michel Py
• Request to Advance "MIB for the Internet Protocol (IP)", Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman
• A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers(was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Pekka Nikander
  • Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers(was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • APIs, locator-identifiers, DNS security, [and Cartesius] (was Re:A strawman analysis...), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: APIs, locator-identifiers, DNS security, [and Cartesius] (was Re: A strawman analysis...), Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locatoridentifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Keith Moore
    • Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Dave Crocker
      • Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locatoridentifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Keith Moore
      • Scope_Id, C i j u O. B a b y
      • Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Eugene M. Kim
      • Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Dave Crocker
      • Re: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), Keith Moore
  • RE: A strawman analysis on locator identifiers vs. non-locator identifiers (was Re: A roadmap for end-point identifiers?), marcelo bagnulo
• About identifiers, HITs, and security (was Re: A roadmap for end-pointidentifiers?), Pekka Nikander
• Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Pekka Savola
  • Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Mark Smith
  • Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, EricLKlein
  • Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?, Brian E Carpenter
• Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
    • effect of deprecated site local addresses on router renumbering (rfc 2894), Suraj
      • Re: effect of deprecated site local addresses on router renumbering (rfc 2894), Elwyn Davies
      • Re: effect of deprecated site local addresses on router renumbering (rfc 2894), Tim Chown
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
    • Comments on 'draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-08.txt', Templin, Fred L
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
  • Weekly posting summary for ipv6 at ietf.org, Rob Austein
• Test - please ignore, Suresh Krishnan (QB/EMC)
• Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems ...), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems...), Randall R. Stewart (home)
      • Re: Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems...), Jari Arkko
• New IPv6 co-chair, Thomas Narten
• Re: About DHTs, byzantine robustness, and security (was Re: A roadmapfor end-point identifiers? ...), Pekka Nikander
• Commercial IDS?, Christian Hoheisel
• New list (ipv6 at ietf.org) Active, Bob Hinden
• test, Bob Hinden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: test, Michel Py
  • test, Mukesh . Gupta
  • test, Nicholas Carbone
  • test, Farida Ariani
  • test, S. Daniel Park
  • test, Bob Hinden
  • test, Alvaro Fernandez Lago
  • Test, Bob Hinden
• set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, George Gross
  • Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, Zefram
    • Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, George Gross
  • Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, George Gross
    • Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: set Global ID field to SHA hash of domain name, Eugene M. Kim
• IPv4 over IPv6 tunnel, xuke
  • Re: IPv4 over IPv6 tunnel, Christian Hoheisel
• Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
  • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
    • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, James Kempf
      • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
  • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
    • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
  • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Dave Crocker
    • Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Bhaskar S
      • Re: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Tim Chown
      • RE: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Chirayu Patel
      • What is the current status of geographic location in the IPv6 address?, EricLKlein
      • Re: What is the current status of geographic location in the IPv6 address?, Brian Haberman
      • Re: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Tim Chown
      • RE: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?, Robson Oliveira
  • RE: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Michel Py
    • RE: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Erik Nordmark
  • RE: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Michel Py
    • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
  • RE: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Michel Py
    • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
      • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
      • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Keith Moore
      • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: domain names as end-point identifiers?, Eugene M. Kim
• (no subject), FIGEN CETIN
  • Re: (no subject), Tim Osburn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • (no subject), B.Svante Eriksson
  • (no subject), masuda yuko
  • (no subject), masuda yuko
  • (no subject), timbeck04
  • RE: (no subject), Christian Huitema
  • (no subject), timbeck04
    • RE: Are privacy extensions, RFC 3041, defined for non global-scope addresses?, John Spence
    • RE: Are privacy extensions, RFC 3041,defined for non global-scope addresses?, timothy enos
  • (no subject), judith minkin
  • (no subject), Anjali Gajendragadkar
  • (no subject), Ignatios Souvatzis
    • Re: What's 16 bits between friends?, Brian Dickson
      • Re: What's 16 bits between friends?, Ignatios Souvatzis
      • RE: What's 16 bits between friends?, michael.dillon
      • Re: What's 16 bits between friends?, Brian Dickson
      • Re: What's 16 bits between friends?, Brian Dickson
      • Re: What's 16 bits between friends?, Mark Smith
      • RE: What's 16 bits between friends?, michael.dillon
      • RE: What's 16 bits between friends?, Templin, Fred L