IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe (was: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?), (continued)
  • Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe (was: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?), Alexandru Petrescu
  • Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Jeroen Massar
  • RE: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, TJ
  • Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Francis Dupont
  • Message not available
  • Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Tim Chown
  • RE: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, TJ
  • Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Jeroen Massar
  • RE: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
  • RE: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, TJ
  • Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Alexandru Petrescu
  • RE: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Chip Popoviciu (cpopovic)
  • RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
  • Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, slblake
  • Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Antonio Querubin
  • RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
  • RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Antonio Querubin
  • Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Mark Smith
  • RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
  • Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Brian Dickson
  • RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
  • Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Christopher Morrow
  • RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
  • RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
  • RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ