IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf, (continued)
  • Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf, Alain Durand
  • Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf, Brian Dickson
• Reminder: HITBSecConf2007 - Malaysia is less than 2 weeks away, Praburaajan
• What about changing default router rules a bit?, Markku Savela
• On-link issues, draft-wbeebee, 2461bis, Jari Arkko
  • RE: On-link issues, draft-wbeebee, 2461bis, Hemant Singh (shemant)
  • RE: On-link issues, draft-wbeebee, 2461bis, Hemant Singh (shemant)
    • RE: On-link issues, draft-wbeebee, 2461bis, Hemant Singh (shemant)
• Is a DNS NS required, when a DHCPv6 Client transmits a Conform message?, Hideshi.Enokihara
  • RE: Is a DNS NS required, when a DHCPv6 Client transmits a Conform message?, Bernie Volz \(volz\)
    • Re: [dhcwg] RE: Is a DNS NS required, when a DHCPv6 Client transmits a Conform message?, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: [dhcwg] RE: Is a DNS NS required, when a DHCPv6 Client transmits a Conform message?, Thomas Narten
• New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, Bob Hinden
  • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, Andrew Sullivan
    • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, briand
  • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, Ryan McBride
  • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, Joe Abley
    • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, james woodyatt
  • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, George V. Neville-Neil
  • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, Vishwas Manral
    • RE: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, Bonness, Olaf
  • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
  • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: New Consensus call on RH0 Deprecation, David Malone