Re: [Isms] Comments on the BTSMS proposal

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Petch <nwnetworks at dial.pipex.com> writes:

    Tom> Sam

    Tom> FYI

    Tom> What the SNMPv3 architecture exposes is the level of security
    Tom> on the wire as (RFC3411 3.4.3. p.29) securityLevel - without
    Tom> authentication and without privacy (noAuthNoPriv) - with
    Tom> authentication but without privacy (authNoPriv) - with
    Tom> authentication and with privacy (authPriv)

These seem like reasonable things for the encapsulation layer to
communicate to the rest of SNMP.


I anticipate no problem with doing this for Ssh, Beep, SASL, TLS or
DTLS.


_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms