RE: [Isms] charter proposal

To: isms at ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Isms] charter proposal
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:16:24 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Cc:
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isms>
List-help: <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.lists.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:isms@lists.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
Sender: isms-bounces at lists.ietf.org

Hi -

Though I agree that distribution of VACM (or other access control
model) rules should be out of scope, I think the discussion of the
last few days gives us good reason to want to not preclude permitting
the solution to address the user/group question.

Randy

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms

Prev by Date: RE: [Ecrit] Performance Requirement
Next by Date: RE: [Isms] securityName
Previous by thread: RE: [Isms] charter proposal
Next by thread: RE: [Isms] charter proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

RE: [Isms] charter proposal

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.