[Isms] #31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant?

To: <isms at ietf.org>
Subject: [Isms] #31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant?
From: "David B Harrington" <dbharrington at comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:08:54 -0400
Cc:
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isms>
List-help: <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.lists.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:isms@lists.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: dbharrington at comcast.net
Sender: isms-bounces at lists.ietf.org
Thread-index: AcXQQrL3vD6D9EVrSHe99RZ6u38/iQ==

#31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant? Can it be calculated once
for the session? Do we need to take into consideration the SSH window
size?

David Harrington
dbharrington at comcast.net




_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Isms] #31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant?
  - From: Randy Presuhn

Prev by Date: [Isms] #30: do we need to check whether securityParameters parses correctly?
Next by Date: [Isms] #32: is the securityName=username default OK?
Previous by thread: [Isms] #30: do we need to check whether securityParameters parses correctly?
Next by thread: Re: [Isms] #31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Isms] #31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.