RE: [Isms] #5: Should discuss management/monitoring needs in non-brokennetworks?

["Kaushik Narayan \(kaushik\)" <kaushik at cisco.com>]

I think #4 & #5 could make a section that talks about impact and
recommendations of using session based security to SNMP, I think this
should be in broader spec (may be applicatability document).


 

-----Original Message-----
From: isms-bounces at lists.ietf.org [mailto:isms-bounces at lists.ietf.org]
On Behalf Of David B Harrington
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:49 PM
To: isms at ietf.org
Subject: [Isms] #5: Should discuss management/monitoring needs in
non-brokennetworks?

#5: Should the SSHSM document include a discussion of ways SNMP could be
extended to better support management/monitoring needs when a network is
running just fine, or can this be covered in the TMSM document, or in an
applicability document?

David Harrington
dbharrington at comcast.net




_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms