Re: [Isms] #31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Isms] #31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant?
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:18:06PM -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> Hi -
>
> > From: "David B Harrington" <dbharrington at comcast.net>
> > To: <isms at ietf.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 3:08 PM
> > Subject: [Isms] #31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant?
> >
> > #31: Is maxSizeResponseScopedPDU relevant? Can it be calculated once
> > for the session? Do we need to take into consideration the SSH window
> > size?
> ...
>
> maxSizeResponseScopedPDU is relevant; getting rid of it would mean
> messing with RFC 3413, something I'm sure we'd rather not do. For
> simplicity, let's leave it where it is, and leave it to implementations to
> decide whether they want to advertise the same value throughout the
> lifetime of a session.
I agree.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.