Re: [Isms] #2: is server authentication a requirement that SNMPwillrequire

To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Isms] #2: is server authentication a requirement that SNMPwillrequire
From: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:22:13 +0200
Authentication-results: imail.cisco.com; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( message from cisco.com verified; );
Cc: isms at ietf.org, dbharrington at comcast.net
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=274; t=1129696362; x=1130128562; c=nowsp; s=nebraska; h=Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=Subject:Re=3A=20[Isms]=20#2=3A=20is=20server=20authentication=20a=20requirement= 20that=20SNMPwillrequire| From:Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com>| Date:Wed,=2019=20Oct=202005=2006=3A22=3A13=20+0200| Content-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20format=3Dflowed| Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit; b=rypg14CYcQbLUC4RSFeigAuybcUVXwuz6WH3WV2p3xnmWp1XfZ69bCC6+BQ6lx6Ylar4wjzC OTF2d4/IiUKig5YfA7HV1Sl9krXHGTVHVFGizz1l3zrnO5TUz13oq8rPsGKbVbZr++YZGH86rxs nD6A/Ow7JF30Cnchme2MOCIA=
In-reply-to: <tslhdbeworf.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isms>
List-help: <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.lists.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:isms@lists.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <618694EF0B657246A4D55A97E38274C3BEC3F7@xmb-sjc-22d.amer.cisco.com> <tslhdbeworf.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Sender: isms-bounces at lists.ietf.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Macintosh/20051006)

Sam,

Again, the goal of ISMS is to provide SNMP with support for *today's*
authentication solutions.

It is not so far from the realm of possibility that X.509 will be here. I hope you will agree that if the SSHSM/SNMP subsystem treats SSH as a black box with appropriate gazzintas and gazzoutas this shouldn't be a problem.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Isms] #2: is server authentication a requirement that SNMPwillrequire
  - From: Sam Hartman

References:
- RE: [Isms] #2: is server authentication a requirement that SNMPwillrequire
  - From: Kaushik Narayan \(kaushik\)
- Re: [Isms] #2: is server authentication a requirement that SNMPwillrequire
  - From: Sam Hartman

Prev by Date: [Isms] meeting in Vancouver
Next by Date: Re: [Isms] #2: is server authentication a requirement that SNMPwillrequire
Previous by thread: Re: [Isms] #2: is server authentication a requirement that SNMPwillrequire
Next by thread: Re: [Isms] #2: is server authentication a requirement that SNMPwillrequire
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Isms] #2: is server authentication a requirement that SNMPwillrequire

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.