[Isms] Issue #s and their context

["David B Harrington" <ietfdbh at comcast.net>]

Hi,

The issues I presented are all related to discussion needed to
complete specific sections of draft-ietf-isms-secshell-00.txt.

To understand the context of issue #32, search for "[discuss] #32" in
the document; to understand the context of other issues, substitute
the chosen issue # in your search pattern. I think that may answer
many questions.

David Harrington
dbharrington at comcast.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: isms-bounces at lists.ietf.org 
> [mailto:isms-bounces at lists.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sam Hartman
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:50 AM
> To: dbharrington at comcast.net
> Cc: isms at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Isms] #32: is the securityName=username default OK?
> 
> >>>>> "David" == David B Harrington <dbharrington at comcast.net>
writes:
> 
>     David> #32: For an incoming message, is using a default
>     David> securityName mapping the right thing to do?
> 
> Can you explain this in more detail?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isms mailing list
> Isms at lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms
> 



_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms