RE: [Isms] #1: is it important to support anonymous user accesstoSNMP?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Isms] #1: is it important to support anonymous user accesstoSNMP?
Fleischman, Eric <> supposedly scribbled:
> This discussion appears to me to have been coupling authentication
> with authorization. If we permit the authentication of an "anonymous"
> entity, then the question of whether or not that entity is authorized
> to do anything useful is a policy issue.
The term "authentication" doesn't seem to apply to anonymous entities.
Hope this helps,
~gwz
Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by simply
listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.