Re: [Isms] tmsm issue #8: MPSP vs SMSP

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at iu-bremen.de>]

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:59:26AM -0400, David Harrington wrote:
 
> If that is the approach we want to take, I can live with it.
> 
> Note that I agree that "the message processing model **should**
> actually not be involved", but I am not convinced that in practice
> this is true. Of course, no implementation actually follows this
> design closely anyway, so in practice the point is unimportant.

In practice, everything is different. But in our architectural model,
the security processing clearly is the job of the security model and
not of the message processing model.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms