Re: [Isms] open issues

["David Harrington" <ietfdbh at comcast.net>]

OK.

dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder 
> [mailto:j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:33 AM
> To: David Harrington
> Cc: 'Randy Presuhn'; isms at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Isms] open issues
> 
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:02:30PM -0400, David Harrington wrote:
>  
> > Since ACM uses securityName/securityModel, this would actually
apply
> > to any transport model that uses TSM.
> 
> I fail to see why. Suppose I have a secure transport where the
> principals at both endpoints are authenticated using say PGP keys.
> Why should TSM then not be able to do the right thing?
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> 


_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms