Re: [Isms] ISMS/SSH and notifications

["Purvis, Ray" <rpurvis at mitre.org>]

Yes, of course, I had USM on the brain.  For TSM, the notification receiver
doesn't really have a whole lot to do with the securityName, does it?
Thanks much.

Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com [mailto:Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 7:11 AM
To: Purvis, Ray; wjhns1 at hardakers.net
Cc: isms at ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Isms] ISMS/SSH and notifications

Ray Purvis wrote:

> [Ray Purvis] Isn't the securityName, in the current RFCs, and thus
> for the use of USM, used with the snmpEngineID to locate the
> authentication and privacy key to authenticate/decrypt the
> notification?

Yes; with SSHTM, at the point when the securityName actually
could be visible, the packet has already been authenticated
and decrypted.

Best regards,
Pasi

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms