Re: [Isms] IsmsSNMP SSH ports
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Isms] IsmsSNMP SSH ports



dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: isms-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:isms-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of David Harrington
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:14 PM
> To: 'Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)'; 'Wes Hardaker'
> Cc: isms at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Isms] IsmsSNMP SSH ports
> 
> I think all we need is two fixed well-known ports (or one that can
> multiplex as needed)
> 
> dbh 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) [mailto:jsalowey at cisco.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 3:35 PM
> > To: Wes Hardaker; David Harrington
> > Cc: isms at ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [Isms] IsmsSNMP SSH ports
> > 
> > Why do we need port numbers in the range 1..1023?  The is 
> > bound to cause
> > a DISCUSS from the IESG. 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: isms-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:isms-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> > > Behalf Of Wes Hardaker
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 11:50 AM
> > > To: David Harrington
> > > Cc: isms at ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Isms] IsmsSNMP SSH ports
> > > 
> > > >>>>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:14:02 -0500, "David Harrington" 
> > > <ietfdbh at comcast.net> said:
> > > 
> > > DH> I think I should eliminate the sentence in section 8. 
> > > PLease correct 
> > > DH> me if I'm wrong.
> > > 
> > > Well, we can either do one well known port with two different 
> > > service names or two well known ports each with the same 
> > service name.
> > > 
> > > Anything with embedded ssh, though, wouldn't want to do two 
> > > different service names if they had both a NR and a CR on the 
> > > same box that wasn't the same process.
> > > 
> > > There has to be some way, however, of distinguishing whether 
> > > you're trying to get to a NR or CR entity.  Yes, you could do 
> > > it via the SNMPv3 pdu handler registration process but in 
> > > reality most software isn't architected that way.
> > > --
> > > Wes Hardaker
> > > Sparta, Inc.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Isms mailing list
> > > Isms at ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms
> > > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isms mailing list
> Isms at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms
> 

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.