Re: [Isms] TBD secshell
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Isms] TBD secshell
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 06:10:08PM -0500, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> The more interesting question is which default port to use if one is not
> specified in the transport address, as this depends upon whether one is
> sending a command or notification. How do the existing transports do
> this?
The SnmpUDPAddress always contains a port number and the same is true
for the formats defined in RFC 3419. So once you have an TAddress,
everything should be fine.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.