Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - sshtm
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - sshtm



--On Sunday, March 01, 2009 09:58:53 AM -0500 David Harrington <ietfdbh at comcast.net> wrote:

The securityLevel and securityModel are transported in the message...
securityName, on the other hand, is a security-model-dependent...
For SSH, the two sides do not have to agree on the same securityName...

I'm still short on sleep, but this sounds sane to me, and I'm fairly convinced there is not a problem -- as long as we believe it's OK that the two parties to a transation might not use the same securityName.

-- Jeff

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.