Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - sshtm
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - sshtm



>>>>> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:25:52 -0500, Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz at cmu.edu> said:

JH> I'm still short on sleep, but this sounds sane to me, and I'm fairly
JH> convinced there is not a problem -- as long as we believe it's OK that
JH> the two parties to a transation might not use the same securityName.

Which, I'll say again: we already agreed upon as a WG that it was OK.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.