Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - e-mail address

To: "tom.petch" <cfinss at dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - e-mail address
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:55:50 -0800
Cc: isms at ietf.org, Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz at cmu.edu>
Delivered-to: isms at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <003d01c99aa8$f5e6d9e0$0601a8c0 at allison> (tom petch's message of "Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:04:05 +0100")
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Sparta
References: <20090226075301.GA29686 at elstar.iuhb02.iu-bremen.de> <200903011326.n21DQ3lU013796 at raisinbran.srv.cs.cmu.edu> <790ACD14D0EE10599A2B2EE0 at atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu> <200903011430.n21EUFO4024727 at toasties.srv.cs.cmu.edu> <009C7BF23F5B9C5373B3C6C1 at atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu> <003d01c99aa8$f5e6d9e0$0601a8c0 at allison>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux, no MULE)

>>>>> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:04:05 +0100, "tom.petch" <cfinss at dial.pipex.com> said:

tp> In particular, it creates the 'Pasi problem', Command Generator
tp> sends a Request with securityName of Alice, gets a Reponse with
tp> securityName of Bob.

No!  That never happens.  A CG that opens a request with a securityName
of "Alice" but a transport address of "bob at example.com" will get back a
securityName of "Alice", ***NOT*** Bob.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - e-mail address
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder

References:
- [Isms] wg last call followup
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - e-mail address
  - From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - e-mail address
  - From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - e-mail address
  - From: tom.petch

Prev by Date: Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - sshtm
Next by Date: [Isms] security name relevant text from the current SSH draft and needed changes
Previous by thread: Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - e-mail address
Next by thread: Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - e-mail address
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - e-mail address

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.