 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And it really fascinates me, that after all this time, some think that the name is there.
Well, of course the name isn't there if the SM gets to decide. I'm not an SNMP expert, though, and for some reason I was under the impression this was present in part of the SNMPv3 message that is not under the SM's control.
That sort of tells me it should be
No, the fact that I was under the impression that part of the SNMPv3 message format was designed badly does not mean that it _should_ be designed badly.
'user' is the name that we do not have in the PDU so we are using a backdoor to get it from local to remote engine.
No. In that example, 'user' is a name that is completely meaningless to SNMP, but is required by ssh, so we're using a backdoor to get it from the local engine to the local SSH client.
-- Jeff