[Isms] Proposed text changes for the secshell draft

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>]

I've hacked up the secshell draft to fix the issue with respect to the
need for a consistent tmSecurtyName.  If nothing else, I think this
discussion has been a good one because it's highlighted that the
tmSecurityName must be consistent for the life of the session and we
didn't state that clearly in the -14 draft.  It was roughly stated in
the text in some obscure ways that I'm not at all sure that
implementations would have gotten it right.

Here's a URL for the diffs (obviously: ignore the not-relevant changes
introduced by date changes, etc):

http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://www.hardakers.net/temp/draft-ietf-isms-secshell-14.txt&url2=http://www.hardakers.net/temp/draft-ietf-isms-secshell-15wes.txt
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.