Re: [Isms] wg last call followup - sshtm

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de>]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 06:47:27PM +0100, tom.petch wrote:
 
> Look in tsm and you will find the e-mail format address there along
> with a brief explanation of what it is about.  You might not find it
> at first, but it is there so it is not just in the sshtm I-D.

Can you please tell us where? It helps me a lot if people try to be
explicit.

> And what it is about is having different securityName in sender and
> receiver which to me is a change to the architecture.  I would have
> thought that RFC341x precluded it somewhere, but, like dbh, I cannot
> see anything to stop us.  But I do see it as different enough to
> need documenting, and tmsm is the place to make architectural
> comments.

[Speaking as technical contributor.]

Since RFC3411 is silent about this (or RFC341x if you want), it can't
be a change of the architecture. I also believe the user at host feature
should be SSH transport specific at this point in time. 

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>