Re: [Isms] (D)TLS question (#1): selecting a client certificate to use

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>]

>>>>> On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:12:50 -0400, "Donati Andrew-MGIA0477" <adonati at motorola.com> said:

DA> If the corresponding row in the tlstmParamsTable is deleted and the
DA> row is automatically removed, I am assuming that setting
DA> tlstmParamsRowStatus to createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5) returns
DA> an error if the corresponding row in the tlstmParamsTable is not
DA> present.

Good point.  The options are:

1) let the row be created in anticipation of another being created later
   in the snmpTargetPararms table.
2) prohibit it with inconsistentValue, which I agree is the right
   choice.

When deleting, I think it makes sense to auto-remove the column from the
tlstmParamsTable table since it's unlikely you'd want it there in the
future.  But, I don't necessarily think that's true for creation and I
don't see us getting a huge amount of benefit from disallowing the
creation of a row in the tlstmParamsTable table when the row in the
snmpTargetParams doesn't exist.  But you're right, that doesn't feel
consistent either.

Opinions welcome :-)
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Cobham Analytic Solutions