[Isms] stockholm isms wg meeting agenda
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Isms] stockholm isms wg meeting agenda



Hi,

I have posted the attached draft Stockholm ISMS WG meeting agenda.
Let me know if there is something that should be changed.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
=============================================================
Integrated Security Model for SNMP WG (isms)
IETF #75, Stockholm
MONDAY, July 27, 2008, 1740-1940, Room Cabaret
=============================================================

WG Chair:	Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de>
WG URL:	  	http://tools.ietf.org/wg/isms/
Jabber:	  	xmpp:isms at jabber.ietf.org

AGENDA:

  1) Agenda bashing, WG status                       (10 min)
     (Juergen Schoenwaelder)

     - Blue sheets
     - Minute and note takers
     - Jabber scribe

  2) DTLS / TLS Transport Model			     (50 min)
     (Wes Hardaker)

  3) RADIUS / VACM Integration			     (50 min)
     (TBD)
       
  4) Wrap up and review of action items              (10 min)
     (Juergen Schoenwaelder)


WG RFCs:

[1] Transport Subsystem for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
    RFC 5590

[2] Transport Security Model for SNMP
    RFC 5591

[3] Secure Shell Transport Model for SNMP
    RFC 5592
  
[4] Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Usage for Simple
    Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Transport Models
    RFC Ed Queue


RELATED INTERNET DRAFTS:

[5] Datagram Transport Layer Security Transport Model for SNMP
    <draft-hardaker-isms-dtls-tm-05.txt>

[6] Extensions to View-based Access Control Model for use with RADIUS
    <draft-nelson-isms-extended-vacm-00.txt>

[7] Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Authorization
    for Network Access Server (NAS) Management
    RFC Ed Queue

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.