Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>]

>>>>> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:29:24 +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de> said:

JS> snmp://tester5 at example.com:5161;transport=ssh
JS>                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
JS>                                 new

I think you're still missing an important element, namely the
securityModel.  No where above does it specify TSM anywhere so I don't
think it's complete as is.

[I think that's likely missing from 4088 as well, for that matter,
regardless of whether it's updated for transport specific concerns; the
fact that it's excluded from the original document is sort of odd in my
opinion in the first place since we're obviously to the point where
multiple security models exist (although they've existed long before this)]

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Cobham Analytic Solutions