Re: [Isms] snmp: URI scheme transport extensions

["David Harrington" <ietfdbh at comcast.net>]

Hi,

Since the purpose of ISMS is to add new transports, I would think this
would belong in ISMS.

dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: isms-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:isms-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 9:29 AM
> To: isms at ietf.org
> Subject: [Isms] snmp: URI scheme transport extensions
> 
> Hi,
> 
> while doing some SNMP during vacation, I did run into an issue with
> the snmp: URI scheme defined in RFC 4088. When RFC 4088 was created,
> we excluded transport information from SNMP service URIs. Now, with
> the presence of much more transports, it would be really nice to
have
> the URI format supporting transport parameters, e.g.
> 
>      snmp://tester5 at example.com:5161;transport=ssh
>                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                                          new
> 
> I would be willing to work on this because I need it for some tools;
> perhaps this work should be hosted at OPSAWG? I obviously forgot to
> bring this up while ISMS was rechartering. But the transports we
have
> to provision extend ISMS transports anyway so OPSAWG might be a good
> choice. Anyway, at this point in time, I just bring this up to see
> whether there is interest to work this out or it is just me.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> _______________________________________________
> Isms mailing list
> Isms at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms
>