Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions

To: David Harrington <ietfdbh at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:35:29 +0200
Cc: "isms at ietf.org" <isms at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: isms at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <017b01ca0ea4$a378f880$7958404e at china.huawei.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: David Harrington <ietfdbh at comcast.net>, 'Wes Hardaker' <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>, "isms at ietf.org" <isms at ietf.org>
References: <20090727072924.GB10456 at elstar.local> <sdprbm5ytd.fsf at wes.hardakers.net> <20090727093204.GA10532 at elstar.local> <017b01ca0ea4$a378f880$7958404e at china.huawei.com>
Reply-to: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:25:48PM +0200, David Harrington wrote:
 
> I believe having ssh **imply** tsm is inappropriate from an RFC3411
> modularity POV.

But not incorrect. ;-) There is only an issue if TSM gets replaced by
something else and the outcome in that case just won't be as short.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

References:
- [Isms] snmp: URI scheme transport extensions
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions
  - From: Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions
  - From: David Harrington

Prev by Date: Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions
Next by Date: [Isms] FW: RFC 5607 on Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS)Authorization for Network Access Server (NAS) Management
Previous by thread: Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions
Next by thread: Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Isms] Ismssnmp: URI scheme transport extensions

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.